出国留学首选一诺留学

【一诺留学】ACT真题练习（四十）

　　同学们小编每天给大家更新的ACT真题你们都练习了吗?同学们每天做一些题对于自己的成绩提升是很有帮助的哦!小编每天给大家更新题目。希望可以对提高同学们的成绩有所帮助!来随小编看看今天的题目吧!

　　SOCIAL SCIENCE: This passage is adapted from Leonard W.

　　Levy's Origins of the Fifth Amendment: The Right Against Self

　　Incrimination. (©1968 by Clio Enterprises Inc.).

　　Community courts and community justice pre-

　　vailed in England at the time of the Norman Conquest

　　[1066]. The legal system was ritualistic, dependent upon oaths at most stages of litigation, and permeated

　　5 by both religious and superstitious notions. The pro-ceedings were oral, very personal, and highly con-

　　frontative. Juries were unknown. One party publicly"appealed," or accused, the other before the community

　　meeting at which the presence of both was obligatory.

　　10 To be absent meant risking fines and outlawry. After the preliminary statements of the parties, the court rendered judgment, not on the merits of the issue nor the question of guilt or innocence, but on the manner by which it should be resolved. Judgment in other words15 preceded trial because it was a decision on what form the trial should take. It might be by compurgation, by ordeal, or, after the Norman Conquest, by battle.

　　Excepting trial by battle, only one party was tried or,more accurately, was put to his "proof." Proof being 20 regarded as an advantage, it was usually awarded to the accused party; in effect he had the privilege of proving his own case.

　　Trial by compurgation consisted of a sworn state-ment to the truth of one's claim or denial, supported by 25 the oaths of a certain number of fellow swearers.

　　Presumably they, no more than the claimant, would endanger their immortal souls by the sacrilege of false swearing.

　　Originally the oath-helpers swore from theirown knowledge to the truth of the party's claim. Later30 they became little more than character witnesses,swearing only to their belief that his oath was trustworthy. If he rounded up the requisite number of compurgators and the cumbrous swearing in very exact form proceeded without a mistake, he won his case.

　　A35 mistake "burst" the oath, proving guilt.

　　Ordeals were usually reserved for more serious crimes, for persons of bad reputation, for peasants, or for those caught with stolen goods. As an invocation of immediate divine judgment, ordeals were consecrated 40 by the Church and shrouded with solemn religious mystery. The accused underwent a physical trial in whichhe called upon God to witness his innocence by putting a miraculous sign upon his body. Cold water, boiling water, and hot iron were the principal ordeals, all of 45 which the clergy administered. In the ordeal of cold water, the accused was trussed up and cast into a pool to see whether he would sink or float. On the theory that water which had been sanctified by a priest would receive an innocent person but reject the guilty, inno 50 cence was proved by sinking—and hopefully a quick retrieval—guilt by floating. In the other ordeals, one had to plunge his hand into a cauldron of boiling water or carry a red hot piece of iron for a certain distance, in the hope that three days later, when the bandages were

　　55 removed, the priest would find a "clean" wound, one that was healing free of infection. How deeply one plunged his arm into the water, how heavy the iron or great the distance it was carried, depended mainly on the gravity of the charge.

　　60 The Normans brought to England still another ordeal, trial by battle, paradigm of the adversary system, which gave to the legal concept of "defense" or"defendant" a physical meaning. Trial by battle was a savage yet sacred method of proof which was also

　　65 thought to involve divine intercession on behalf of the righteous. Rather than let a wrongdoer triumph, Godwould presumably strengthen the arms of the party who had sworn truly to the justice of his cause. Right, not might, would therefore conquer. Trial by battle was

　　70 originally available for the settlement of all disputes but eventually was restricted to cases of serious crime.

　　Whether one proved his case by compurgation, ordeal, or battle, the method was accusatory in char-acter. There was always a definite and known accuser,75 some private person who brought formal suit and openly confronted his antagonist. There was never any secrecy in the proceedings, which were the same for criminal as for civil litigation. The judges, who had no role whatever in the making of the verdict, decided only

　　80 which party should be put to proof and what its form should be; thereafter the judges merely enforced an observance of the rules. The oaths that saturated the proceedings called upon God to witness to the truth of the respective claims of the parties, or the justice of 85 their cause, or the reliability of their word. No one gave testimonial evidence nor was anyone questioned to test

　　his veracity.

　　——————————————————————————————————

　　Which of the following factors did all the trials discussed have in common?

　　I. A definite and known accuser

　　II. Secrecy

　　III. Oaths and invocations of divine assistance

　　A. I only

　　B. II only

　　C. I and II only

　　D. I and III only

　　答案：D

　　【解析】The best answer is D. Line 74 supports option I; lines 76–77 contradict what is stated in option II (thus eliminating B and C as plausible choices); and lines 82–85 prove III. Given that both I and III are true, the best and most complete answer is D.

　　以上是一诺留学小编给大家介绍的内容，希望可以帮助到同学们!同学们如果还有任何关于ACT的问题，可以拨打一诺留学的免费热线400-003-6508或者010-62680991进行咨询，或者点击一诺留学官方网站http://www.yinuoedu.net/页面的“在线咨询”与一诺留学专家直接对话。微信订阅号：留学圈 (微信帐号：yinuoliuxue )